91/92 camaro
#2
06-26-2008, 09:19 PM
RE: 91/92 camaro
hmmmm I can't tell you about a V6 but my 91 Rs with a 305 TBI get on average 22 mpg. 
#3
06-26-2008, 09:56 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 973
RE: 91/92 camaro
17-18 city, 27-28 highway for a '91/'92 V6.
15-16 city, 25-26 highway for a '91/'92 V8. There isn't a significant difference between the 305 and 350.
In all seriousness, it's not that bad even with a V8. I've got a 305 TPI, and at equivalent of $5.35/gallon, it cost at most $55/450km (roughly 275 miles)
You yankees are funny, griping about prices we'd beg to be able to pay :v
15-16 city, 25-26 highway for a '91/'92 V8. There isn't a significant difference between the 305 and 350.
In all seriousness, it's not that bad even with a V8. I've got a 305 TPI, and at equivalent of $5.35/gallon, it cost at most $55/450km (roughly 275 miles)
You yankees are funny, griping about prices we'd beg to be able to pay :v
#4
06-27-2008, 12:49 AM
RE: 91/92 camaro
More power does not always mean less MPGs. When you have more power it takes less throttle to get a response. Plus having a 2:77 rear gear does not hurt for mpgs.
And I am not familure with Canadian curency. Is it the same rate as American?
And I am not familure with Canadian curency. Is it the same rate as American?
#5
06-27-2008, 01:06 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 973
RE: 91/92 camaro
ORIGINAL: MadMikeZ28
More power does not always mean less MPGs. When you have more power it takes less throttle to get a response. Plus having a 2:77 rear gear does not hurt for mpgs.
And I am not familure with Canadian curency. Is it the same rate as American?
More power does not always mean less MPGs. When you have more power it takes less throttle to get a response. Plus having a 2:77 rear gear does not hurt for mpgs.
And I am not familure with Canadian curency. Is it the same rate as American?
Not exactly, but it's so close to being the same right now it may as well be.
That $5.35/gallon is converted into US dollars, for ease of comparison. Last price I paid was CAN$1.44/L
#7
06-27-2008, 12:32 PM
RE: 91/92 camaro
I should have put 22 mpg combined. Not just city. Anytime I go on a road trip which consist of highway, back roads, in town and anything which has speeds between 25 to 65-70ish mph I check it.
just the other day I was on a drive that took me on the highway for about a third of it and the small highways through he hills and small towns and waits for road construction with 3rd and 4th gear driving up and down hills and I got near 23 mpg with spirited driving.
just the other day I was on a drive that took me on the highway for about a third of it and the small highways through he hills and small towns and waits for road construction with 3rd and 4th gear driving up and down hills and I got near 23 mpg with spirited driving.
#9
06-28-2008, 08:33 PM
RE: 91/92 camaro
my 3.1 in my '90 RS is getting about 25 in town. when i had my 350 in my car (before i did damage) i was averaging around 21 in town. all depends on how light (or heavy) your right foot is
#10
06-30-2008, 10:31 AM
RE: 91/92 camaro
ORIGINAL: BIG.D
22 mpg city?
Is anyone else gettin around 22 mpg city with a 305 TBI ?
ORIGINAL: MadMikeZ28
hmmmm I can't tell you about a V6 but my 91 Rs with a 305 TBI get on average 22 mpg.
hmmmm I can't tell you about a V6 but my 91 Rs with a 305 TBI get on average 22 mpg.
Is anyone else gettin around 22 mpg city with a 305 TBI ?
j/k
aropund 22mpg for city/highway combined is what i get
