400 sbc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-23-2008, 04:13 PM
Gordon24Camaro's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 138
Default 400 sbc

well i bought an 1985 Iroc-Z with a 400 sbc, Turbo 350 but no title, so i was thinking of swapping the engine into my 89 RS. Is this a good move, or is the 350 a better investment, it's going to be a daily driver only but with some kick in it to keep the ricers at bay. My only concern is my t-5, can it support its power and is the swap even worth it, i have a 305 in it right now? Thank you
 
  #2  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:41 PM
jim022659's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 141
Default RE: 400 sbc

do you know what your rear end ratio is?
 
  #3  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:53 PM
350rs's Avatar
March 2008 ROTM
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 2,437
Default RE: 400 sbc

its all in what your wanting. 400's are known for their torque. But honestly, if your going to keep this your DD, keep with the 350
 
  #4  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:28 PM
Y2Keglide's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yacolt,WA
Posts: 2,144
Default RE: 400 sbc

Just FYI the 400 small block is an externally balanced engine so the flywheel and harmonic balancer have to be for a 400,you can't use the flywheel off the 305 or a 350 with that engine.
Other than that it should be a plug & play,just get the right flywheel and harmonic balancer.
 
  #5  
Old 12-25-2008, 08:20 AM
aussiesmg's Avatar
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 10
Default RE: 400 sbc

My built 400 makes over 500hp and 500 ft lbs, it is internally balanced now but it is a very extensive build.
 
  #6  
Old 12-25-2008, 08:55 AM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,353
Default RE: 400 sbc

T-5 was not offered with the 350 because it could not handle the torque. Compaired to the 350 the 400 is a torque monster. the 400/350 combo can be a good match if the 350 has been beefed up.Many of the SB 400 came with TH400 from the factory.
 
  #7  
Old 12-25-2008, 01:50 PM
Gordon24Camaro's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 138
Default RE: 400 sbc

I'd really prefer to keep the car a manual transmission cause its a whole lot more fun and for that little extra fuel mileage. What about a t-56 swap or maybe rebuilding the t-5? Also has anyone heard of a 400 sbc with a tpi unit. I have TBI on the 305 right now and carb on the 400 and a 400 TBI doesnt interest me AT ALL, what would you guys do?
 
  #8  
Old 12-25-2008, 01:58 PM
mtn_maro's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montclair CA
Posts: 322
Default RE: 400 sbc

i think i read somewhere its the design of the t-5 that makes it weak. not the gears. but dont quote me on that. i think your best bet would be the t-56 swap.
 
  #9  
Old 12-29-2008, 02:46 PM
rockin85's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 430
Default RE: 400 sbc

i like the 400 sbc but people tell me they have really thin cylinder walls. so they can do damage if they happen to overheat. just a heads up.
 
  #10  
Old 12-30-2008, 01:23 AM
jim022659's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 141
Default RE: 400 sbc

I have heard that as well, so if you are interested, you can do like what I am doing and using the 400 pistons and crank to make a wicked 383 stroker witha 350 4 bolt main block. just a suggestion. I know some here will pont out you could buy one for less headachs that cost about 5 grand ( and it do look sweet), but something about the " ya I built it myself" thing I kinda like.lol.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.