302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 01:35 AM
  #1  
cluelessk's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Default 302

I am trying to prove to my dad that chev built a 302 for the Camaro. When I talk about a 302 made by chev he says no the 302 is aFord engine.He got mad at me for disagreing with him. Can I get a link to a website with strong facts.
 
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 02:31 AM
  #2  
badinfluenceRS's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,702
From:
Default RE: 302

camarosource .com or .ca or whatever...

they put 302's in 1st gens to meet requirements for the trans am racing league or whatever...but other than that, gm did not carry on the 302 and it is known as a ford engine
 
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 07:01 AM
  #3  
wildpaws's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 187
From: near Richmond, VA
Default RE: 302

While many people are more familar with the Ford 302, let me assure you that the 302 in the '67, '68, and '69 Z/28 was a Chevy motor through and through. The Chevy 302 was a destroked 327 cid obtained by putting a 283cid crankshaft in a 327cid block, this had been a popular hot rodder's trick for many years before Chevy did so in '67. It was a very high compression engine with a solid lifter camshaft allowing very high revving, all fed by a large Holley carb, the factory rated 290HP was extremely "conservative" with the actual HP ratings in the 350-450HP range depending on where you look/read. I believe that the Chevy 302 was actually in production and available for purchase before the Ford 302 was as Ford was still running the 289cid engine in the '67 Trans Am Series. Andoh yeah, the Chevy 302 Z/28 combination kicked Ford's butt in the Trans Am Series.
Clyde
 
Old Jul 29, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #4  
cluelessk's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Default RE: 302

thanks
 
Old Jul 29, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #5  
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,215
From: North East PA
Default RE: 302

302 Camaro in nostalgia Trans Am race:

 
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 10:34 PM
  #6  
89rscamaro's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 16
Default RE: 302

were there diff motor mounts or if someone were to find one of these today would it bolt right in?
ORIGINAL: wildpaws

While many people are more familar with the Ford 302, let me assure you that the 302 in the '67, '68, and '69 Z/28 was a Chevy motor through and through. The Chevy 302 was a destroked 327 cid obtained by putting a 283cid crankshaft in a 327cid block, this had been a popular hot rodder's trick for many years before Chevy did so in '67. It was a very high compression engine with a solid lifter camshaft allowing very high revving, all fed by a large Holley carb, the factory rated 290HP was extremely "conservative" with the actual HP ratings in the 350-450HP range depending on where you look/read. I believe that the Chevy 302 was actually in production and available for purchase before the Ford 302 was as Ford was still running the 289cid engine in the '67 Trans Am Series. Andoh yeah, the Chevy 302 Z/28 combination kicked Ford's butt in the Trans Am Series.
Clyde
 
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
wildpaws's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 187
From: near Richmond, VA
Default RE: 302

All small block Chev. engines use the same motor mounts in a particular car, i.e. 302, 307, 327, 350 all use the same motor mounts in a Camaro, the 396 and 427 big blocks used a different motor mount in the Camaro. So yes, you can "bolt it right in" if you are dealing with a small block Camaro.
Clyde
 
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #8  
FEandSneakinUpOnYa's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 17
Default RE: 302

Hey Young Jedi... Not only did Chevy make the 302 that beat Ford's 289 in 1967(the Ford 302 wasn't made until 1968, and the Boss 302 was rated at the same 290 hp. that Chevy made) Everyone competes..

Anyhow, Chevy stopped the 302 production due to the increasing butt whoopin it was putting on their Special car the Corvette... Not nice when your intermediate size family car was putting the kickass on the Vette... That's not the complete reason but it had a healthy hand in the decision...
 
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 07:58 AM
  #9  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default RE: 302

You really want to mess with your dad tell him you want a Dodge Trans AM with a factory 302. Mopar built a challenger with TA on the side with a modified version of their 340 destroked to a 302.
 
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #10  
wildpaws's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 187
From: near Richmond, VA
Default RE: 302

ORIGINAL: Gorn

You really want to mess with your dad tell him you want a Dodge Trans AM with a factory 302. Mopar built a challenger with TA on the side with a modified version of their 340 destroked to a 302.
Ain't it the truth!! There are so many engine sizes from the big three that it is hard to keep track of them all. Back in the early '80s I had a heck of an argument with a "friend" (Tom was his name) that was a few years younger than myself, I was talking about another friend's '60 Impala with a 348 three two barrels. Tom, being the "know it all" he always was (and a Mazda RX7 driver) immediately informed me that GM never built a 348, but a 350 cid. Iquickly bet him $50 on it, turned to some other guysat an adjoining pooltable and asked"What was the smaller version of the 409?", to which they immediately replied "the 348", I promptly collected my $50!!
Clyde
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.