Camaro Forums - Chevy Camaro Enthusiast Forum

Camaro Forums - Chevy Camaro Enthusiast Forum (https://camaroforums.com/forum/)
-   67-69 General (https://camaroforums.com/forum/67-69-general-43/)
-   -   67 Camaro RS-SS (https://camaroforums.com/forum/67-69-general-43/67-camaro-rs-ss-7353/)

jd621033 Oct 12, 2006 05:16 PM

67 Camaro RS-SS
 
I found a 67 Camaro today the owners calls an RS-SS. it is an unrestored car. that is in pretty good shape. I decoded the trim tag to be a 1967 V-8 Coupe, Black standard interior with bucket seats and console. Shows to be a 4 speed and Super Sport. exterior code was Plum (M-M). the original engine is missing, but was replaced with a 4 bolt 350. Still has the original m-21, but the console is missing. It has the hidden headlights. the grille, front fenders, and fuel cap have SS, but that is it, none on the interior. the question I have is the car doesn't have disc brakes and has a single trac 10 bolt rear end. Is this correct? also what makes this an RS-SS? Thanks.

uncle bill Oct 12, 2006 10:05 PM

RE: 67 Camaro RS-SS
 
In 1967, Camaros came with an SS ( Super Sport ) package that had either a 295 HP 350 or a 325HP, 350 HP or 375 HP 396. The RS ( Rally Sport ) package included the hidden headlights. I had a SS396-350 4 speed Plum '67 Camaro ( kind of a neat color ) that I bought new in '67. I think it cost about $ 2700.00 ant did not have a console either.

81CanuckZ Oct 13, 2006 01:36 AM

RE: 67 Camaro RS-SS
 
From what i understand, the blacked out ehadlights tell you its a RS. I know for sure that they were independent packages and could be ordered separate or together in first gen cars. I'd look it up in a book i have on camaros but i just lent it to a friend who bought an 83 Z28 last weekend.

gen1camaro Oct 16, 2006 12:57 AM

RE: 67 Camaro RS-SS
 
I am assuming that it has the correct front valance with the parking lights in it, and also the correct tail lamp panel with the back up lights below the rear bumper. If it has all of the wiring for the hide away headlights chances are its definitely a factory rs, and as for the ss my understanding is that was a performance option that meant it had 350 engine, and should have a rare torque rod going from the top of the rear end housing to the bottom of the unibody to prevent wheel hop since they were mono leaf rear suspension. 1967 was still a bit early for the disc brakes. It would have had to been optioned with what they call the jl8 disc brake option which is rare but also junk from my understanding because they were 4 piston caliper which always had problems. If the price is right for the car though you really can't go wrong. I have a 1967 and am surprised how much money and how few of them you see. Hope this helps. Jeff

aayan Mar 8, 2009 06:06 AM

Impala Disc Brake Conversions
 
1 Attachment(s)
Blah blah blah.

This was a sales pitch till I fixed it..... CT

Camaro 69 Mar 8, 2009 02:47 PM

^ Is that a sales pitch?
And why the Impala info? That wouldn't do him any good anyway.
Oh yeah, and this thread belongs in the "1st Gen" section.

Gorn Mar 8, 2009 08:40 PM

Yes its a sales pitch on a three year old post :)

Camaro 69 Mar 8, 2009 10:53 PM

Doh! No wonder none of those other user names rang a bell! :cool:
The ultimate resurrection!

1badrsss Feb 20, 2012 02:24 PM

Hi I ave an unrestored 67 rs-ss 4 sp 350 with the disk brakes if you need some pics you can email me at thekratedetailer@aol.com

Camaro 69 Feb 20, 2012 02:47 PM

^ You do realize this is a 5+ year old question?
My bet, that one-post-wonder at the top ain't coming back!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands