Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
#1
07-21-2008, 05:06 PM
Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
If you were to choose based on looks only which one would it be? For me it would be Challenger/Camaro/Mustang. They are all good looking cars don't get me wrong the Camaro is still going to be in my garage some day but they did such a great job with the Challenger that at this point I think that car looks the best.
#2
07-21-2008, 06:24 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Helens, Oregon
Posts: 2,237
RE: Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
camaro, mustang, challenger. The challenger is too much of a pig. The camaro is awesome, and the mustang has an awesome aftermarket, such as roush (sp?)
#4
07-21-2008, 07:51 PM
RE: Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
For me, the Challenger is clearly the front runner when it comes to looks. I think they did a great job with doing a retro without over doing it. I was fortunate enough to see an orange Challenger on the way to Jacksonville, FL over the 4th of July weekend. The car was very sweet! The Mustang...eh...way too much plastic in the interior and it just looks/feels cheap. The design of the car just doesn't do it for me, but neither did the 60's Mustangs. But, you cannot beat the value of a 300 horse GT for low to mid 20's. I will have to wait and see a Camaro in person. The Camaro needs to lose that satellite antenna or make it optional...really detracts from the styling for me. The Mustang does not have one and the one on the Challenger is small in comparison to the one on the Camaro.
#5
07-23-2008, 02:59 PM
RE: Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
If its just on looks I would have to go challenger,Camaro,Mustang.
#9
08-05-2008, 12:12 PM
RE: Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
i PERSONALLY THINK MUSTANGS ARE THE UGLIEST THING I think Camaros are the way to Go
#10
08-06-2008, 11:20 PM
RE: Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
Who needs to pay for satellite anyhow GM: just build in HD Radio STANDARD!!!
ORIGINAL: PsyDoc
For me, the Challenger is clearly the front runner when it comes to looks. I think they did a great job with doing a retro without over doing it. I was fortunate enough to see an orange Challenger on the way to Jacksonville, FL over the 4th of July weekend. The car was very sweet! The Mustang...eh...way too much plastic in the interior and it just looks/feels cheap. The design of the car just doesn't do it for me, but neither did the 60's Mustangs. But, you cannot beat the value of a 300 horse GT for low to mid 20's. I will have to wait and see a Camaro in person. The Camaro needs to lose that satellite antenna or make it optional...really detracts from the styling for me. The Mustang does not have one and the one on the Challenger is small in comparison to the one on the Camaro.
For me, the Challenger is clearly the front runner when it comes to looks. I think they did a great job with doing a retro without over doing it. I was fortunate enough to see an orange Challenger on the way to Jacksonville, FL over the 4th of July weekend. The car was very sweet! The Mustang...eh...way too much plastic in the interior and it just looks/feels cheap. The design of the car just doesn't do it for me, but neither did the 60's Mustangs. But, you cannot beat the value of a 300 horse GT for low to mid 20's. I will have to wait and see a Camaro in person. The Camaro needs to lose that satellite antenna or make it optional...really detracts from the styling for me. The Mustang does not have one and the one on the Challenger is small in comparison to the one on the Camaro.