bone stock dyno today
#2
07-21-2010, 03:20 PM
yeah thats pretty good dude, specially at the wheels. You auto or manual?? what type of dyno?
I wouldn't get too hooked up on dyno numbers, they all vary
best test is your 1/4 mile time
I wouldn't get too hooked up on dyno numbers, they all vary
best test is your 1/4 mile time
#3
07-21-2010, 04:54 PM
MotorTrend dyno'd a stock 2002 SS, but their #s seem low, since a stock 2001+ should be higher than your 2000 (with the cam change and LS6 intake starting in 2001)...
Max hp/rpm 268.4/4400
Max torque/rpm 280.8/4200
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ang_specs.html
Max hp/rpm 268.4/4400
Max torque/rpm 280.8/4200
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ang_specs.html
#5
07-22-2010, 08:30 PM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
So...not too shabby!
#6
07-23-2010, 02:19 AM
i dyoned it on a Dynojet. and i have a t-56 6speed.. the guy was telling me i should get a tune with the hp tuners... is this a normal tuning device for the ls1 f-bodies? i just put the airbox lid from SLP maybe the numbers might be higher now =) oh and btw the guy also was telling me i was pinging and im running very lean? idk if this is normal for being stock!?
#7
07-23-2010, 11:56 AM
i dyoned it on a Dynojet. and i have a t-56 6speed.. the guy was telling me i should get a tune with the hp tuners... is this a normal tuning device for the ls1 f-bodies? i just put the airbox lid from SLP maybe the numbers might be higher now =) oh and btw the guy also was telling me i was pinging and im running very lean? idk if this is normal for being stock!?
#8
07-24-2010, 12:13 PM
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Brag NC (no longer in iraq)
Posts: 2,200
MotorTrend dyno'd a stock 2002 SS, but their #s seem low, since a stock 2001+ should be higher than your 2000 (with the cam change and LS6 intake starting in 2001)...
Max hp/rpm 268.4/4400
Max torque/rpm 280.8/4200
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ang_specs.html
Max hp/rpm 268.4/4400
Max torque/rpm 280.8/4200
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ang_specs.html
It sounds like your O2 or MAF may be on its way out if you are running lean on a stock car. I am betting if you figure out which one is giving you problems and replace it you would have probably seen closs to 300 at the wheels.
#9
07-24-2010, 07:49 PM
Motortrend is also the devil. I wouldn't listen to any thing they report what so ever. With that being said that's probably the lowest dyno i have ever seen from any LS1 engine by a lot. The average T56 LS1 will dyno right around 290-300 at the rear wheels bone stock and should be around 310 torque. Even A4 guys will normally dyno 285 plus with no problems. Also peak horsepower should be made well over 5200 RPM's not at 4400 so that raises a question right there. Plus i would expect peak torque to be made much lower as well. But hey what do i know.
It sounds like your O2 or MAF may be on its way out if you are running lean on a stock car. I am betting if you figure out which one is giving you problems and replace it you would have probably seen closs to 300 at the wheels.
It sounds like your O2 or MAF may be on its way out if you are running lean on a stock car. I am betting if you figure out which one is giving you problems and replace it you would have probably seen closs to 300 at the wheels.
#10
07-25-2010, 12:13 PM
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Brag NC (no longer in iraq)
Posts: 2,200
Bone stock 4L60 1999 vette with around 100K.
If you look at the dyno you will see peak torque is made at around 3300 and peak horse power is much hits right around 5300 way off from what motortrend reported. I dont know what motortrend was dynoing but something sounds funny.
If you look at the dyno you will see peak torque is made at around 3300 and peak horse power is much hits right around 5300 way off from what motortrend reported. I dont know what motortrend was dynoing but something sounds funny.
Last edited by cbr600rx7; 07-25-2010 at 12:21 PM.