What changes to the Gen V should be made for Gen VI??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 08-02-2012, 09:21 AM
RPDRed6's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by ForrGump
I thought the heavy cow of muscle cars was the Dodge Challenger? That beast is heavy and lumbers along.
it gets up and goes though, I love the Challenger
 
  #22  
Old 08-02-2012, 09:25 AM
RPDRed6's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by nj85z28
I mean everyone will have their opinions on why the car was killed in 2002...I believe styling had ALOT to do with it..

I did a little research and found the production numbers broken down by year. I then retyped them and split them up by generation and added each generation up...by far the FOURTH GEN was the least produced...which translates to..the least ordered by dealers and the least SOLD. Even the First gen, a car in production for 1/3 of the time beats it. The numbers do not lie.


Here is the TOTAL PRODUCTION NUMBERS of Camaro since 1967.

1st Generation (1967-1969)

1967- 220,906
1968- 235,147
1969- 243,085
(Total Production 699,138)

2nd Generation (1970-1981)

1970- 124,901
1971- 114,630
1972- 68,651
1973- 96,751
1974- 151,008
1975- 145,770
1976- 182,959
1977- 218,853
1978- 272,631
1979- 282,582
1980- 152,005
1981- 126,138
(Total Production 1,936,879)

3rd Generation (1982-1992)

1982- 189,735
1983- 154,381
1984- 261,591
1985- 180,018
1986- 192,219
1987- 137,760
1988- 96,275
1989- 110,739
1990- 35,000
1991- 100,838
1992- 70,007
(Total Production 1,528,563)

4th Generation (1993-2002)

1993- 40,224
1994- 125,244
1995- 122,725
1996- 61,362
1997- 54,972
1998- 49,218
1999- 42,098
2000- 45,461
2001- 29,009
2002- 41,776
(Total Production 612,089)
nj85z28, any idea why sales numbers dropped so much for 2001 and then went up in 2002? I own a 01 and I'm curious
 
  #23  
Old 08-02-2012, 03:26 PM
H2C's Avatar
H2C
H2C is offline
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Usa, SC
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by RPDRed6
nj85z28, any idea why sales numbers dropped so much for 2001 and then went up in 2002? I own a 01 and I'm curious
Special end game editions if I'm not mistaken
 
  #24  
Old 08-02-2012, 04:00 PM
nj85z28's Avatar
Senior Administrator
February 2012 ROTM
May 2012 ROTM
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 121,560
Default

Originally Posted by RPDRed6
nj85z28, any idea why sales numbers dropped so much for 2001 and then went up in 2002? I own a 01 and I'm curious
I believe its two factors. number one, the entire platform was nearly 10 years old without major changes aside from the engine and bumper.
then like H2C said there were special editions. the 35th anniversary was that year, the Last of the Breed was offered for Firebird and the car was marketed as the last.. Alot of people probably figured they would own a piece of history. If you look at the statistics the year after any official anniversary model year was very poor.

1992 was the 25th anniversary, and 1993 dropped 30k units, even though it was the first year for the gen 4

1997 was the 30th, and 1998, even with the updated front end and engine combo was down
 
  #25  
Old 08-02-2012, 04:50 PM
slick's camaro's Avatar
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 874
Default

Wow!! I would of stopped production too. If they didn't camaros probably would've became the laughing talk in the industry. Imo I wish they make the 5th less bulky and slim, sexy, with the same mean look. Like a TA or something.
 
  #26  
Old 08-02-2012, 05:19 PM
GreenMamba's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Grove, OK
Posts: 191
Default

I agree with H2C. There needs to be more flexibility in options. As it is now, with almost every car on the market, you have to get a fully loaded top of the line model to get a couple things you actually want. I want to be able to get the big engine, the 6 speed trans, and not have to pay for a navi, or heated windshield washer jets. Crank windows, manual locks, vinyl seats, and 400hp. Thats a damn car!
 
  #27  
Old 08-02-2012, 05:46 PM
H2C's Avatar
H2C
H2C is offline
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Usa, SC
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by GreenMamba
I agree with H2C. There needs to be more flexibility in options. As it is now, with almost every car on the market, you have to get a fully loaded top of the line model to get a couple things you actually want. I want to be able to get the big engine, the 6 speed trans, and not have to pay for a navi, or heated windshield washer jets. Crank windows, manual locks, vinyl seats, and 400hp. Thats a damn car!
Preach it brother.
Imagine a 4th gen style car with about a 2300~ pound wet weight and 300 HP turbo 4...
Excuse me while I change my pants
 
  #28  
Old 08-04-2012, 12:40 PM
auto's Avatar
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 826
Default

+10 on the t tops, these were something that separated these cars from the rest. they should have a special edition option titled: Trans Am or Bandit. this being a 6th gen, but with a different outer body, flip up lights, bird on the hood, and the baddest engine/trans/rear combo available. to boost sales on it they should do a limited production run per year, say 500? It would put the squeeze on the crowd. if i remember correctly, the Grand National in its last year 1987, sold regular GNs and GNXs; something like 547. they all sold and most kept their value, i remember a few years back Id see them on ebay going for 100 thousand. so if they make a limited edition called trans am, i can definitely see this selling out like hotcakes.

As for camaros, i only sat in one at the autoshow. RS should be v6, then z28, then SS. however the body kits should be different this way each could be easily recognized as what it is. unlike the 5th gens.

If GM keeps at this rate of repeating the cars timeline, then the next camaro would be like a second gen? It may sell, it may not, but i dont think it would be a good idea to do the copycat thing again, they need to lose the bulkiness of the 5th gens and bring it back to the basic fundamentals of what a camaro is made up of, and then go from there. speed, torque, stance, options, shape
 
  #29  
Old 08-05-2012, 09:36 AM
H2C's Avatar
H2C
H2C is offline
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Usa, SC
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by auto
flip up lights,
Are Illegal now, Impales pedestrians in a crash
 
  #30  
Old 08-08-2012, 01:09 AM
Scooch's Avatar
Super Scooch
January 2009 ROTM
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,455
Default

Originally Posted by H2C
Are Illegal now, Impales pedestrians in a crash

meanwhile, cow catchers are still a go. stupid crap. if you get hit by a friggin car the flip up headlight is the least of your worries.

I miss the TransAm, that was always a sexy car.
 


Quick Reply: What changes to the Gen V should be made for Gen VI??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.